Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755721AbcJTRsL (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:48:11 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:46138 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755266AbcJTRsI (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:48:08 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 smtp.codeaurora.org 7DB89616FE Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sboyd@codeaurora.org Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 10:48:05 -0700 From: Stephen Boyd To: Jiancheng Xue Cc: Rob Herring , Pan Wen , Michael Turquette , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Wei Xu , linux-clk , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , howell.yang@hisilicon.com, jalen.hsu@hisilicon.com, lvkuanliang 00222834 , suwenping@hisilicon.com, raojun@hisilicon.com, kevin.lixu@hisilicon.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] clk: hisilicon: add CRG driver for Hi3516CV300 SoC Message-ID: <20161020174805.GA26139@codeaurora.org> References: <20161017120705.3726-1-wenpan@hisilicon.com> <20161017120705.3726-3-wenpan@hisilicon.com> <20161018155835.qyoffwznacdac46y@rob-hp-laptop> <7ce2e35b-19e1-9493-90a7-15b321fee2cc@hisilicon.com> <5dc55eef-808e-fa78-a5a0-4fccb31e5ceb@hisilicon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5dc55eef-808e-fa78-a5a0-4fccb31e5ceb@hisilicon.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 571 Lines: 14 On 10/19, Jiancheng Xue wrote: > > I'm pretty sure that the patch was sent to the DT list devicetree@vger.kernel.org. > You had asked a question about "hi3798cv200-sysctrl" and I replied (https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/10/10/517). > I'm waiting for your new comments. If there's some misunderstatnding, please let me know. > Are there two patch series that touch the same clk binding document? Can you please combine them and resend them if that's the case? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project