Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 15:05:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 15:05:20 -0500 Received: from animal.cs.chalmers.se ([129.16.225.30]:33244 "EHLO animal.cs.chalmers.se") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 15:05:08 -0500 Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 21:05:00 +0100 (MET) From: Dennis Bjorklund To: William T Wilson cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Broadcast In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 1 Nov 2000, William T Wilson wrote: > If rwhod doesn't have an option as to which address to bind to, your only > choice is to block its communication with ipchains. I don't think you can specify the addresses. It looks at the interfaces and sends to the ones that can broadcast. I have solved it with ipchains but then rwhod fills my /var/log/messages with lines like: Nov 1 20:40:28 x rwhod[650]: sendto(192.168.0.1): Operation not permitted Nov 1 20:43:28 x rwhod[650]: sendto(192.168.0.1): Operation not permitted Nov 1 20:46:28 x rwhod[650]: sendto(192.168.0.1): Operation not permitted It's a lot of messages... So if you cant turn of broadcast why does ifconfig have an option that says it turns of broadcast. [-]broadcast [addr] If the address argument is given, set the protocol broadcast address for this interface. Otherwise, set (or clear) the IFF_BROADCAST flag for the interface. And rwhod looks at the IFF_BROADCAST flag. /Dennis - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/