Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933582AbcJUMzY (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:55:24 -0400 Received: from mail.sigma-star.at ([95.130.255.111]:46011 "EHLO mail.sigma-star.at" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933297AbcJUMtW (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:49:22 -0400 From: Richard Weinberger To: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dedekind1@gmail.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com, tytso@mit.edu, jaegeuk@kernel.org, david@sigma-star.at, wd@denx.de, sbabic@denx.de, dengler@linutronix.de, Richard Weinberger Subject: [PATCH 21/26] ubifs: Rename tnc_read_node_nm Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:48:36 +0200 Message-Id: <1477054121-10198-22-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.3 In-Reply-To: <1477054121-10198-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> References: <1477054121-10198-1-git-send-email-richard@nod.at> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1851 Lines: 61 tnc_read_hashed_node() is a better name since we read a node by a given hash, not a name. Signed-off-by: Richard Weinberger --- fs/ubifs/tnc.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/ubifs/tnc.c b/fs/ubifs/tnc.c index 0d0030461cb4..0d751297873e 100644 --- a/fs/ubifs/tnc.c +++ b/fs/ubifs/tnc.c @@ -378,7 +378,7 @@ static void lnc_free(struct ubifs_zbranch *zbr) } /** - * tnc_read_node_nm - read a "hashed" leaf node. + * tnc_read_hashed_node - read a "hashed" leaf node. * @c: UBIFS file-system description object * @zbr: key and position of the node * @node: node is returned here @@ -388,8 +388,8 @@ static void lnc_free(struct ubifs_zbranch *zbr) * added to LNC. Returns zero in case of success or a negative negative error * code in case of failure. */ -static int tnc_read_node_nm(struct ubifs_info *c, struct ubifs_zbranch *zbr, - void *node) +static int tnc_read_hashed_node(struct ubifs_info *c, struct ubifs_zbranch *zbr, + void *node) { int err; @@ -1454,7 +1454,7 @@ again: * In this case the leaf node cache gets used, so we pass the * address of the zbranch and keep the mutex locked */ - err = tnc_read_node_nm(c, zt, node); + err = tnc_read_hashed_node(c, zt, node); goto out; } if (safely) { @@ -1817,7 +1817,7 @@ static int do_lookup_nm(struct ubifs_info *c, const union ubifs_key *key, goto out_unlock; } - err = tnc_read_node_nm(c, &znode->zbranch[n], node); + err = tnc_read_hashed_node(c, &znode->zbranch[n], node); out_unlock: mutex_unlock(&c->tnc_mutex); @@ -2815,7 +2815,7 @@ struct ubifs_dent_node *ubifs_tnc_next_ent(struct ubifs_info *c, goto out_free; } - err = tnc_read_node_nm(c, zbr, dent); + err = tnc_read_hashed_node(c, zbr, dent); if (unlikely(err)) goto out_free; -- 2.7.3