Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755589AbcJUNol (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 09:44:41 -0400 Received: from resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net ([69.252.207.37]:39491 "EHLO resqmta-ch2-05v.sys.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755379AbcJUNoj (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 09:44:39 -0400 Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 08:44:41 -0500 (CDT) From: Christoph Lameter X-X-Sender: cl@east.gentwo.org To: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" cc: Piotr Kwapulinski , mhocko@kernel.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, Peter Zijlstra , Rik van Riel , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , lkml , linux-man , Brice Goglin Subject: Re: Rewording language in mbind(2) to "threads" not "processes" In-Reply-To: <67165fae-b965-eb34-ecf5-4247acaecee1@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <67165fae-b965-eb34-ecf5-4247acaecee1@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfDuoXWmdwhvxqTS9IaDMDJ2RWPYGqnoWnjYsHk4VziN9WOOxvMNnMXIazjnyrOe9YugSe5HwrA7pxthKEbylZ3BaeXHMplikRXM9dmcJTcTODI7hePOk S075Sq3GcEz4uvGr0adhVBUXDnInVdOXF0RETQFHP7TqTWy909oo2FTT3uYspsgo+OeXEPQCgTuQxpHtnAsYIIoZHbwAhqeZxtXaBOAELJ6WRVSo1Ubws1xy 42CKNrZHC2z4Gnu2t6m2O/SoFNHNxH/i51b/wBZzHuv+O58js8giW9o2xM2DNGhc1TqRGuDqu8mMqmGQTGzrJn9JwsrZukqkI9TQ5ylZ3aOEiCv6tQY0ZMmn n10f5uQODu7XJ/hUpoxdVh6DHnsrC3BQ1S2lanJ7bKPhxGxBx7gxroFhLG/s/DWiw48U6QvtoY6WqDnWK2PUwf5QInkyhdq1DAzEOPvjoJNJ/MOmtwMWzeM3 NtDN+gf5PkY6BaLQ Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 262 Lines: 10 On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > Did you have any thoughts on my follow-on question below? There was only one AFAICT? > > Thanks. So, are all the other cases where I changed "process" to > > "thread" okay then? >From what I see yes.