Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S936097AbcJUT2e (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:28:34 -0400 Received: from out02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.232]:55692 "EHLO out02.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935976AbcJUT2a (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Oct 2016 15:28:30 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Andrei Vagin Cc: Andrey Vagin , Alexander Viro , Linux Containers , linux-fsdevel , LKML References: <1476141965-21429-1-git-send-email-avagin@openvz.org> <877f9c6ui8.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <87pon458l1.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20161013214650.GB19836@outlook.office365.com> <87wphb4pjn.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <8737jy3htt.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.org> <20161018024000.GA4901@outlook.office365.com> <87r37e9mnj.fsf@xmission.com> <877f95ngpr.fsf_-_@xmission.com> <20161020213052.GA25226@outlook.office365.com> Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 14:26:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20161020213052.GA25226@outlook.office365.com> (Andrei Vagin's message of "Thu, 20 Oct 2016 14:30:53 -0700") Message-ID: <87pomtec6c.fsf@xmission.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1bxfUR-0007NV-Br;;;mid=<87pomtec6c.fsf@xmission.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=75.170.125.99;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/shkhRvwxKpc5raH94ZRlHW0mSsZUWlF8= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 75.170.125.99 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address * 0.7 XMSubLong Long Subject * 1.5 TR_Symld_Words too many words that have symbols inside * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.4999] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa03 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa03 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: **;Andrei Vagin X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 466 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 3.7 (0.8%), b_tie_ro: 2.6 (0.6%), parse: 1.20 (0.3%), extract_message_metadata: 25 (5.3%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.99 (0.2%), tests_pri_-1000: 9 (1.9%), tests_pri_-950: 1.98 (0.4%), tests_pri_-900: 1.56 (0.3%), tests_pri_-400: 24 (5.1%), check_bayes: 22 (4.7%), b_tokenize: 8 (1.7%), b_tok_get_all: 6 (1.2%), b_comp_prob: 3.0 (0.6%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.7 (0.6%), b_finish: 0.86 (0.2%), tests_pri_0: 378 (81.1%), check_dkim_signature: 0.86 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 4.6 (1.0%), tests_pri_500: 17 (3.7%), poll_dns_idle: 7 (1.5%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [REVIEW][PATCH] mount: In propagate_umount handle overlapping mount propagation trees X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 444 Lines: 15 Andrei Vagin writes: >> Barring some stupid mistake this looks like it fixes both the performance >> and the correctness issues I was able to spot earlier. Andrei if you >> could give this version a look over I would appreciate it. > > Eric, could you try out this script: [snip script] > It hangs up on my host with this patch. Ugh. I am seeing the hang as well digging into it. Thanks for keeping me honest. Eric