Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964876AbcJVKJL (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:09:11 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:37731 "EHLO mail-wm0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936463AbcJVKJH (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Oct 2016 06:09:07 -0400 Subject: Re: Rewording language in mbind(2) to "threads" not "processes" To: Christoph Lameter References: <67165fae-b965-eb34-ecf5-4247acaecee1@gmail.com> Cc: mtk.manpages@gmail.com, Piotr Kwapulinski , mhocko@kernel.org, mgorman@techsingularity.net, Peter Zijlstra , Rik van Riel , "linux-mm@kvack.org" , lkml , linux-man , Brice Goglin From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" Message-ID: Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2016 12:08:59 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 556 Lines: 24 On 10/21/2016 03:44 PM, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote: > >> Did you have any thoughts on my follow-on question below? > > There was only one AFAICT? > >>> Thanks. So, are all the other cases where I changed "process" to >>> "thread" okay then? > >>From what I see yes. > > Thanks, Christoph. I've added a Reviewed-by from you. Cheers, Michael -- Michael Kerrisk Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/ Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/