Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965086AbcJVX5o (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Oct 2016 19:57:44 -0400 Received: from cloudserver094114.home.net.pl ([79.96.170.134]:59057 "HELO cloudserver094114.home.net.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S936469AbcJVX5m (ORCPT ); Sat, 22 Oct 2016 19:57:42 -0400 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah.kh@samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.8 00/57] 4.8.4-stable review Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 02:04:41 +0200 Message-ID: <10504414.asNck97anh@vostro.rjw.lan> User-Agent: KMail/4.11.5 (Linux/4.8.0-rc2+; KDE/4.11.5; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20161022095851.GD15422@kroah.com> References: <20161021091435.435647262@linuxfoundation.org> <2069349.GOlkPb4Nuc@vostro.rjw.lan> <20161022095851.GD15422@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1143 Lines: 30 On Saturday, October 22, 2016 11:58:51 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 11:02:13PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > On Friday, October 21, 2016 11:17:23 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.8.4 release. > > > There are 57 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > > > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > > > let me know. > > > > > > Responses should be made by Sun Oct 23 09:14:19 UTC 2016. > > > Anything received after that time might be too late. > > > > Please also add commit c6fe46a79ecd "cpufreq: fix overflow in > > cpufreq_table_find_index_dl()" to this series. > > > > This is needed to fix a regression in an earlier somewhat broken fix that went > > into previous 4.8.y unfortunately. > > Really? It doesn't apply to 4.8-stable at all. I haven't applied > 899bb6642f2a2f2cd3f77abd6c5a14550e3b37e6 to the 4.8-stable tree yet, OK In that case please make sure that it doesn't go in without c6fe46a79ecd. > so why should I add it at this point in time? Clearly, no need. :-) Thanks, Rafael