Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S934180AbcJWMxo (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sun, 23 Oct 2016 08:53:44 -0400
Received: from mail-lf0-f67.google.com ([209.85.215.67]:33832 "EHLO
        mail-lf0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S932200AbcJWMxn (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sun, 23 Oct 2016 08:53:43 -0400
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 18:53:33 +0600
From: Alexander Kuleshov <kuleshovmail@gmail.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/entry64: remove unused audit related macros
Message-ID: <20161023125333.GA1360@localhost>
References: <20161022181032.19135-1-kuleshovmail@gmail.com>
 <20161023075528.qrebhx5lmqrulz6t@pd.tnic>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161023075528.qrebhx5lmqrulz6t@pd.tnic>
X-Operating-System: Linux
X-Date: Sun Oct 23 18:39:37 +06 2016
User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0-rc0 ((null))
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 484
Lines: 16

Hello Borislav,

On 10-23-16, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> I'd prefer it if you said which patch *removed* them and made those
> defines unused again.
> 
> What would be even better is if your commit message explained *why* they
> were removed in that patch and that because of <insert reason here> we
> don't need them here anymore.
> 
> This should give people looking at your patch the warm and fuzzy feeling
> they need in order to apply it. :-)

I will describe this in V2.

Thanks.