Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753705AbcJXEbr (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:31:47 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:50045 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751137AbcJXEbn (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:31:43 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 smtp.codeaurora.org 5533C61AF5 Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=okaya@codeaurora.org From: Sinan Kaya To: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, bhelgaas@google.com, ravikanth.nalla@hpe.com, linux@rainbow-software.org, timur@codeaurora.org, cov@codeaurora.org, jcm@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com Cc: net147@gmail.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, agross@codeaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, wim@djo.tudelft.nl, Sinan Kaya , Len Brown , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH V5 1/3] ACPI, PCI, IRQ: assign ISA IRQ directly during early boot stages Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 00:31:30 -0400 Message-Id: <1477283492-26657-2-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 1.9.1 In-Reply-To: <1477283492-26657-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> References: <1477283492-26657-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1544 Lines: 41 We do not want to store the SCI penalty in the acpi_isa_irq_penalty[] table because acpi_isa_irq_penalty[] only holds ISA IRQ penalties and there's no guarantee that the SCI is an ISA IRQ. We add in the SCI penalty as a special case in acpi_irq_get_penalty(). But if we called acpi_penalize_isa_irq() or acpi_irq_penalty_update() for an SCI that happened to be an ISA IRQ, they stored the SCI penalty (part of the acpi_irq_get_penalty() return value) in acpi_isa_irq_penalty[]. Subsequent calls to acpi_irq_get_penalty() returned a penalty that included *two* SCI penalties. Signed-off-by: Sinan Kaya Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas --- drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c index c983bf7..6229b02 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used) continue; if (used) - new_penalty = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) + + new_penalty = acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] + PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED; else new_penalty = 0; @@ -871,7 +871,7 @@ static int __init acpi_irq_penalty_update(char *str, int used) void acpi_penalize_isa_irq(int irq, int active) { if ((irq >= 0) && (irq < ARRAY_SIZE(acpi_isa_irq_penalty))) - acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] = acpi_irq_get_penalty(irq) + + acpi_isa_irq_penalty[irq] += (active ? PIRQ_PENALTY_ISA_USED : PIRQ_PENALTY_PCI_USING); } -- 1.9.1