Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757397AbcJXLJk (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:09:40 -0400 Received: from ec2-52-42-241-221.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com ([52.42.241.221]:54236 "EHLO gw.crowfest.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753962AbcJXLJj (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 07:09:39 -0400 Message-ID: <1477307377.6666.1.camel@crowfest.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: vc04_services: Fix unportable cast in vchiq_copy_from_user From: Michael Zoran To: Dan Carpenter Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, daniels@collabora.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, eric@anholt.net, noralf@tronnes.org, popcornmix@gmail.com Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 04:09:37 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20161024105403.GA4469@mwanda> References: <20161024052918.28205-1-mzoran@crowfest.net> <20161024105403.GA4469@mwanda> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.22.1-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1679 Lines: 51 On Mon, 2016-10-24 at 13:54 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:29:18PM -0700, mzoran@crowfest.net wrote: > > From: Michael Zoran > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Zoran > > --- > >  drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm.c > > | 2 +- > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git > > a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm. > > c > > b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm. > > c > > index 32d12e6..98c6819 100644 > > --- > > a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm. > > c > > +++ > > b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_2835_arm. > > c > > @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ remote_event_signal(REMOTE_EVENT_T *event) > >  int > >  vchiq_copy_from_user(void *dst, const void *src, int size) > >  { > > - if ((uint32_t)src < TASK_SIZE) { > > + if ((unsigned long)src < TASK_SIZE) { > >   return copy_from_user(dst, src, size); > >   } else { > >   memcpy(dst, src, size); > > > This code looks totally wrong still.  That's not how we differentiate > kernel pointers from user pointers. > > Also no commit message (I tend not to read the subject) so it took me > a > while to figure out what was going on.  Anyway, everything needs a > commit message.  That's a rule. > > regards, > dan carpenter > I didn't think it looked totally correct, but I'm not sure it's any more broken then what is already in the tree. If you can kindly point me to some other source code or documentation to look at that is correct, I'm more then willing to fix the patch.