Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757329AbcJXSqA (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:46:00 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:45188 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756895AbcJXSp4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:45:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 19:45:43 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Heiner Kallweit Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Heiner Kallweit , Nobuteru Hayashi , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <20161024184543.GR17252@sirena.org.uk> References: <20161017220342.1627073-1-arnd@arndb.de> <20161017221355.1861551-5-arnd@arndb.de> <20161024172713.GI17252@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="By57YlnFViWR/M0S" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: When the cup is full, carry it level. User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2a01:348:6:8808:fab::3 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/28] spi: fsl-espi: avoid processing uninitalized data on error X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk); Unknown failure Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1353 Lines: 37 --By57YlnFViWR/M0S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 08:36:37PM +0200, Heiner Kallweit wrote: > Am 24.10.2016 um 19:27 schrieb Mark Brown: > > This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend. > The not yet reviewed part of my patch series from Oct 2nd, > namely "[PATCH 07/11] spi: fsl-espi: fix and improve reading > from RX FIFO" replaces the code in question. > There's more to fix like removing polling from the ISR. > If you prefer to apply Arnd's fix first I'd rebase the open part > of the patch series and resend it. If there are dependencies you should mention them when you resend (in general you should always mention any unapplied or cross tree dependencies when sending things). --By57YlnFViWR/M0S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJYDlbVAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQkzYIAIVf0fPd0zNwSgmyBFo2B6ic WklJfI3yw6BLbuOo6reX4iqjVURk0taWdgHK+00/P05fKeF/GhQAG8BZHJFAvOgn G2iGR/cTcUWeQXLHFP0NA7DmrI8e1Ua+Zw7NRaTqhVTfWA9vzmWZHWovN91UlnpY 6JXPng2ARQF8zsiAxAAf6SLe70BHOZHmmJYeGgvDq+asHfwmlowD/D2cEOGxwLwR J8mJ16lxdnVJQ67iYdVAkFjRPG3BUD185uPs5fJuAl127Zidj7rVfpYLO070SFgC DyD0LUMgMzSNO+0ktWaioONyHPUQXfe1XwHj7Gg5JHvtZPm75eeKF2o5kXG4GA8= =uRfA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --By57YlnFViWR/M0S--