Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S941295AbcJXSzB (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:55:01 -0400
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:58970 "EHLO
        Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1754846AbcJXSv7 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 24 Oct 2016 14:51:59 -0400
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 20:48:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
cc: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        Jason Low <jason.low2@hpe.com>, Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
        Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 -tip] locking/rtmutex: Reduce top-waiter blocking on
 a lock
In-Reply-To: <20161024180845.GA10177@linux-80c1.suse>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610242047580.4815@nanos>
References: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609221236010.5599@nanos> <20160922144123.GB13358@linux-80c1.suse> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609221641540.5599@nanos> <20160922151144.GC13358@linux-80c1.suse> <57E43A46.9080601@hpe.com> <57E43EF9.8000400@hpe.com> <20160922213921.GA30291@linux-80c1.suse>
 <alpine.DEB.2.20.1609222339180.5640@nanos> <57E45438.2010307@hpe.com> <20160927190220.GA31822@linux-80c1.suse> <20161024180845.GA10177@linux-80c1.suse>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 138
Lines: 5

On Mon, 24 Oct 2016, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:

> Any comments? can this make it for v4.10?

We need to fry the futex/rtmutex fish first....