Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758019AbcJYG1p (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 02:27:45 -0400 Received: from up.free-electrons.com ([163.172.77.33]:33562 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753126AbcJYG1n (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 02:27:43 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 08:27:37 +0200 From: Boris Brezillon To: Sascha Hauer Cc: Lukasz Majewski , Thierry Reding , Stefan Agner , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Bhuvanchandra DV , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de, Fabio Estevam , Fabio Estevam , Lothar Wassmann Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] pwm: imx: Rewrite imx_pwm_*_v1 code to facilitate switch to atomic pwm operation Message-ID: <20161025082737.2ecc9fe4@bbrezillon> In-Reply-To: <20161025055454.emytytmcg6d23jdd@pengutronix.de> References: <1477259146-19167-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@majess.pl> <1477259146-19167-2-git-send-email-l.majewski@majess.pl> <20161025055454.emytytmcg6d23jdd@pengutronix.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2975 Lines: 84 On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 07:54:54 +0200 Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 11:45:41PM +0200, Lukasz Majewski wrote: > > The code has been rewritten to remove "generic" calls to > > imx_pwm_{enable|disable|config}. > > > > Such approach would facilitate switch to atomic PWM (a.k.a ->apply()) > > implementation. > > > > Suggested-by: Stefan Agner > > Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon > > Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski > > --- > > drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------ > > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c > > index c37d223..83e43d5 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c > > +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c > > @@ -66,8 +66,6 @@ struct imx_chip { > > static int imx_pwm_config_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip, > > struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns) > > { > > - struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip); > > - > > /* > > * The PWM subsystem allows for exact frequencies. However, > > * I cannot connect a scope on my device to the PWM line and > > @@ -85,26 +83,52 @@ static int imx_pwm_config_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip, > > * both the prescaler (/1 .. /128) and then by CLKSEL > > * (/2 .. /16). > > */ > > + struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip); > > u32 max = readl(imx->mmio_base + MX1_PWMP); > > u32 p = max * duty_ns / period_ns; > > + int ret; > > + > > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_ipg); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + > > writel(max - p, imx->mmio_base + MX1_PWMS); > > > > + clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_ipg); > > + > > return 0; > > } > > > > -static void imx_pwm_set_enable_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool enable) > > +static int imx_pwm_enable_v1(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) > > { > > struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip); > > + int ret; > > u32 val; > > > > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_ipg); > > + if (ret) > > + return ret; > > + > > val = readl(imx->mmio_base + MX1_PWMC); > > + val |= MX1_PWMC_EN; > > + writel(val, imx->mmio_base + MX1_PWMC); > > > > - if (enable) > > - val |= MX1_PWMC_EN; > > - else > > - val &= ~MX1_PWMC_EN; > > + clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per); > > This looks wrong. You start by enabling clk_ipg which is needed for > register access, but then end with disabling clk_per which is needed for > driving the actual PWM output. This function should probably enable > clk_per on entry and enable clk_ipg while accessing registers. Oh, I didn't notice there was 2 different clocks here. This probably means you have to enable clk_ipg when manipulating the registers in ->disable(). One question, if there's a separate clk for the registers, why don't we leave this clock enabled, and disable it in ->suspend() or ->remove() instead of enabling/disabling it each time we access the registers?