Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755923AbcJYHpd (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 03:45:33 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:39405 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753148AbcJYHpc (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 03:45:32 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:45:15 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Stuart Yoder Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, agraf@suse.de, arnd@arndb.de, german.rivera@nxp.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, leoyang.li@nxp.com, Ioana Ciornei Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/14] staging: fsl-mc: misc whitespace cleanup Message-ID: <20161025074515.GB22581@kroah.com> References: <1476729796-10141-1-git-send-email-stuart.yoder@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1476729796-10141-1-git-send-email-stuart.yoder@nxp.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 654 Lines: 20 On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 01:43:16PM -0500, Stuart Yoder wrote: > From: Ioana Ciornei > > Make whitespace consistent with other fsl-mc source files. > -delete extraneous tabs > -align start of function arguments properly > -for structs and function definitions, separate type and > variable name by a single space > -remove multiple blank lines in comments That's a lot of different types of whitespace cleanups to do all at once, can I get some sort of verification that this produces the same .o files? I wouldn't accept a patch like this from anyone else, why should it be ok for you to send it? thanks, greg k-h