Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1758739AbcJYJ32 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:29:28 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f65.google.com ([74.125.82.65]:33818 "EHLO
        mail-wm0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1758225AbcJYJ30 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 25 Oct 2016 05:29:26 -0400
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:29:16 +0200
From: luca abeni <luca.abeni@unitn.it>
To: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>,
        Claudio Scordino <claudio@evidence.eu.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 1/6] Track the active utilisation
Message-ID: <20161025112916.67eb245c@utopia>
In-Reply-To: <de0b4be7-5481-e4c7-f1eb-298ebd677b8f@redhat.com>
References: <1477317998-7487-1-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.it>
        <1477317998-7487-2-git-send-email-luca.abeni@unitn.it>
        <de0b4be7-5481-e4c7-f1eb-298ebd677b8f@redhat.com>
Organization: university of trento
X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.30; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1118
Lines: 49

Hi Daniel,

On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:09:52 +0200
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com> wrote:
[...]
> > +static void add_running_bw(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct
> > dl_rq *dl_rq) +{
> > +	u64 se_bw = dl_se->dl_bw;
> > +
> > +	dl_rq->running_bw += se_bw;
> > +}  
> 
> why not...
> 
> static *inline*
> void add_running_bw(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct dl_rq
> *dl_rq) {
> 	dl_rq->running_bw += dl_se->dl_bw;
> }
> 
> am I missing something?

I do not know... Maybe I am the one missing something :)
I assumed that the compiler is smart enough to inline the function (and
to avoid creating a local variable on the stack), but if there is
agreement I can change the function in this way.



			Thanks,
				Luca


> 
> > +static void sub_running_bw(struct sched_dl_entity *dl_se, struct
> > dl_rq *dl_rq) +{
> > +	u64 se_bw = dl_se->dl_bw;
> > +
> > +	dl_rq->running_bw -= se_bw;
> > +	if (WARN_ON(dl_rq->running_bw < 0))
> > +		dl_rq->running_bw = 0;
> > +}  
> 
> (if I am not missing anything...)
> 
> the same in the above function: use inline and remove the se_bw
> variable.
> 
> -- Daniel