Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1758892AbcJYN7c (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:59:32 -0400
Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:35164 "EHLO
        Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1756703AbcJYN7a (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 25 Oct 2016 09:59:30 -0400
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:56:55 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Mason <slash.tmp@free.fr>
cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
        Sebastian Frias <sf84@laposte.net>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Disabling an interrupt in the handler locks the system up
In-Reply-To: <580F647B.5000202@free.fr>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610251556280.4990@nanos>
References: <580A4460.2090306@free.fr> <a79e2d2c-8ec8-744f-50fb-8c39216aa23e@arm.com> <580A60ED.3030307@free.fr> <20161021201448.3f4a0a7a@arm.com> <580A70B9.8060507@free.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610212147420.4855@nanos> <580A7A2B.5000702@free.fr>
 <20161022123713.6dc788b3@arm.com> <580BF1D4.2030509@free.fr> <580E3308.4050507@free.fr> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610241847580.5002@nanos> <580F17E7.5060603@laposte.net> <580F1992.2070602@free.fr> <534c4588-f220-25a3-e7aa-84484f348bd1@arm.com>
 <580F647B.5000202@free.fr>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 155
Lines: 8

On Tue, 25 Oct 2016, Mason wrote:
> Is the irq_mask() call-back exposed via some module-visible API?

No. And there is no reason to do so.

Thanks,

	tglx