Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 15:17:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 15:17:42 -0500 Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk ([194.168.151.1]:28960 "EHLO the-village.bc.nu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Wed, 1 Nov 2000 15:17:33 -0500 Subject: Re: 2.2.18p18 eepro100 issues (packets per irq, shared irqs) To: pc_pimp@hotmail.com (KJ Pickett) Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2000 20:18:15 +0000 (GMT) Cc: eepro100@scyld.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: from "KJ Pickett" at Nov 01, 2000 07:35:32 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Alan Cox Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > They share an irq, no matter if I'm using intels e100.o driver or the stock > linux one. For performance reasons, can I make them each have a different > irq? Doing it from ifconfig gives me a notsupported error, with either > driver. Under 2.2 no. Under 2.4 maybe > no kernel hacker...can I get the stock linux driver to do multiple packets > per irq with some config settings? We dont have sufficient docs to figure this out easily. Intel upload magic numbers to the card microcode - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/