Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755954AbcJYTuG (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:50:06 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f178.google.com ([209.85.192.178]:35166 "EHLO mail-pf0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753514AbcJYTuE (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 15:50:04 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 12:50:01 -0700 From: Brian Norris To: Jonathan Corbet Cc: Nicholas Mc Guire , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [DOC] Missing completions-design.txt? Message-ID: <20161025195000.GA17604@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 947 Lines: 28 Hi, It looks like Nicholas submitted this doc a while back as patch 2/2: "[PATCH 2/2] doc: detailed documentation for completion" http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1412.2/03676.html where patch 1/2 got merged as this: 202799be447b doc: brief user documentation for completion References in the introduced completion.txt doc have pointed lost souls at an elusive completion-design.txt: "for details on completion design and implementation see completions-design.txt" Since as we well know, most developers are religious readers of documentation, presumably there are people out there waiting expectantly for such a file to appear in their otherwise exhaustive Documentation/. Can you help such lost souls out? Thanks, Brian P.S. I haven't actually read the design doc that closely yet. Who would trust such a random patch off the archives, after all? So just removing the mention of this file might be a satisfactory solution.