Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S942087AbcJYVox (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:44:53 -0400 Received: from smtp.codeaurora.org ([198.145.29.96]:41658 "EHLO smtp.codeaurora.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753342AbcJYViH (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2016 17:38:07 -0400 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 smtp.codeaurora.org 597A2615FF Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; dmarc=none header.from=codeaurora.org Authentication-Results: pdx-caf-mail.web.codeaurora.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rkuo@codeaurora.org Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 16:37:35 -0500 From: Richard Kuo To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" , Julia Lawall , linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Hexagon-setup: Combine four seq_printf() calls into one call in show_cpuinfo() Message-ID: <20161025213735.GA27715@codeaurora.org> References: <20161021154624.maiwbgjmzlzhin2l@thunk.org> <48d54097-6be3-d39d-2af9-d4ad90c3c417@users.sourceforge.net> <20161021175317.nnb2keq7m3phwgbv@thunk.org> <20c77dde-a1a0-8383-f344-a6f788af68d9@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20c77dde-a1a0-8383-f344-a6f788af68d9@users.sourceforge.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1689 Lines: 48 I wrote it the original way precisely for readability; it's easier, at least to me, to read and modify the old way. However, in my development version I happen to be printing a lot more stuff. To test, I collapsed 18 of my seq_printf's into one call. That reduced the function size by a couple hundred bytes. (Didn't do anything for the final kernel size though.) If it makes things better, even if only slightly, doesn't introduce bugs, and doesn't otherwise violate any other rules (correct me if I'm wrong), I would personally accept the minor readability tradeoff in this case. Acked-by: Richard Kuo On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 08:50:11PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > > When the author of the semantic patch language is telling you to stand down, > > The collaboration evolved between Julia and me during the years somehow. > Different software development opinions occur then as usual. > Further opinions from contributors like you can eventually show variations > between disagreement and acceptance. > > > > and you still want to try to argue for blind application of patches, > > I guess that we have got different views about "blind" tries. > > > > we have a really big problem. > > I hope that potential communication difficulties can still be resolved. > > > > Especially when some of your patches have actually introduced bugs. > > I assume that these incidents could be clarified further, couldn't they? > > Regards, > Markus > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hexagon" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html