Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966975AbcJZMhj (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:37:39 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:37936 "EHLO mail-wm0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966962AbcJZMhd (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Oct 2016 08:37:33 -0400 User-agent: mu4e 0.9.17; emacs 25.1.1 From: Jakub Sitnicki To: Baoyou Xie Cc: andrew@lunn.ch, vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, arnd@arndb.de, xie.baoyou@zte.com.cn, han.fei@zte.com.cn, tang.qiang007@zte.com.cn Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtl8xxxu: mark symbol static where possible In-reply-to: <1477474370-31383-1-git-send-email-baoyou.xie@linaro.org> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 14:37:15 +0200 Message-ID: <87twbz2sn8.fsf@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1212 Lines: 30 On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 09:32 AM GMT, Baoyou Xie wrote: > We get 1 warning when building kernel with W=1: > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtl8xxxu/rtl8xxxu_8192e.c:1557:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'rtl8192eu_power_off' [-Wmissing-prototypes] > > In fact, this function is only used in the file in which it is > declared and don't need a declaration, but can be made static. > So this patch marks this function with 'static'. > > Signed-off-by: Baoyou Xie > --- > drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c > index 883fd98..4d975f0 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c > +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c > @@ -2701,7 +2701,7 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_setup_port(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port) > return mv88e6xxx_port_write(chip, port, PORT_DEFAULT_VLAN, 0x0000); > } > > -int mv88e6xxx_g1_set_switch_mac(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, u8 *addr) > +static int mv88e6xxx_g1_set_switch_mac(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, u8 *addr) > { > int err; Probably a mix-up - your patch doesn't match the description. Thanks, Jakub