Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S942507AbcJ0ORq (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:17:46 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:33866 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936557AbcJ0ORl (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:17:41 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161026110459.GA15276@red-moon> References: <20161018160414.1228-1-lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> <20161026110459.GA15276@red-moon> From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:24:48 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 4BRyGMtQcihMXKni0IG-uUx995w Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] ACPI IORT ARM SMMU support To: Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: "open list:AMD IOMMU (AMD-VI)" , Will Deacon , Marc Zyngier , Robin Murphy , Joerg Roedel , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Tomasz Nowicki , Hanjun Guo , Jon Masters , Eric Auger , Sinan Kaya , Nate Watterson , Prem Mallappa , Dennis Chen , ACPI Devel Maling List , Linux PCI , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1218 Lines: 33 On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 1:04 PM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > Rafael, Joerg (and anyone else CC'ed), > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 05:03:58PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: >> This patch series is v6 of a previous posting: >> >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/9/418 >> >> v5 -> v6 >> - Rebased against v4.9-rc1 >> - Changed FWNODE_IOMMU to FWNODE_ACPI_STATIC >> - Moved platform devices creation into IORT code >> - Updated fwnode handling >> - Added default dma masks initialization > > Any comments on v6 ? Patches touching generic ACPI code > are {1, 2, 7}, patch 4 updates the IOMMU of_iommu_{set/get}_ops() > API to make it work on ACPI systems too, by replacing the > device_node with a fwnode_handle pointer as look-up token; > the remainder of patches are ARM specific and creates the > infrastructure to probe ARM SMMU devices through ACPI, > ARM IORT table in particular. Given the generic bits changes > above I would not leave it to late -rc to reach an agreement > please, thank you. I'll do my best to look at these in the next few days, but please also note what I wrote before: http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=147744344531599&w=2 Thanks, Rafael