Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1033458AbcJ0OYV (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:24:21 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:52370 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S941341AbcJ0OYD (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2016 10:24:03 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 15:04:20 +0200 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: "kernelci.org bot" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux@roeck-us.net, shuah.kh@samsung.com, patches@kernelci.org, ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.8 000/140] 4.8.5-stable review Message-ID: <20161027130420.GB10262@kroah.com> References: <20161026122220.384323763@linuxfoundation.org> <5811acdd.4336c20a.fcad1.2674@mx.google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5811acdd.4336c20a.fcad1.2674@mx.google.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 974 Lines: 26 On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 12:29:33AM -0700, kernelci.org bot wrote: > stable-rc boot: 110 boots: 2 failed, 102 passed with 6 offline (v4.8.4-140-gc88a99a91d3e) > > Full Boot Summary: https://kernelci.org/boot/all/job/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8.4-140-gc88a99a91d3e/ > Full Build Summary: https://kernelci.org/build/stable-rc/kernel/v4.8.4-140-gc88a99a91d3e/ > > Tree: stable-rc > Branch: local/linux-4.8.y > Git Describe: v4.8.4-140-gc88a99a91d3e > Git Commit: c88a99a91d3ee65635a471133cc04a5dcbbe02eb > Git URL: http://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git > Tested: 27 unique boards, 11 SoC families, 24 builds out of 206 > > Boot Failures Detected: https://kernelci.org/boot/?v4.8.4-140-gc88a99a91d3e&fail > > arm: > > multi_v7_defconfig+CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING=y: > vexpress-v2p-ca15-tc1: 1 failed lab > vexpress-v2p-ca15_a7: 1 failed lab This is the same error as before, so I can just ignore them, right? thanks, greg k-h