Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755948AbcJ0Qyi (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:54:38 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f193.google.com ([209.85.192.193]:35220 "EHLO mail-pf0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755930AbcJ0Qyg (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2016 12:54:36 -0400 Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 13/13] of: Remove unused variable overlay_symbols To: Pantelis Antoniou References: <1477429146-27039-1-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> <1477429146-27039-14-git-send-email-frowand.list@gmail.com> <27823D48-C6B1-486C-8460-9B3C33DDC62F@antoniou-consulting.com> <58122AF9.3040709@gmail.com> Cc: Rob Herring , devicetree , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Frank Rowand Message-ID: <58123122.8020908@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:53:54 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <58122AF9.3040709@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1144 Lines: 35 On 10/27/16 09:27, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 10/27/16 07:41, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: >> Hi Frank, >> >> >>> On Oct 25, 2016, at 23:59 , frowand.list@gmail.com wrote: >>> >>> From: Frank Rowand >>> >>> This unused variable is a reminder that symbols in overlays are >>> not available to subsequent overlays. If such a feature is >>> desired then there are several ways it could be implemented. >>> >> >> Please don’t apply that. There’s a patch that actually imports >> the symbol table from overlays that subsequent operations >> work. >> >> Please see: >> >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9104701/ > > Thanks for the pointer! When the import symbols patch is applied > then the comment in my patch header becomes incorrect. I will > change the patch comment to act is if the import symbols patch > is in place. > > But the node pointer that my patch removes is still not used > for anything, even if the import symbols patch is applied. > > Am I missing something? I was missing a later patch in the symbol import patch set that updated resolver.c to use the imported symbols. I'll go look at that.