Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S965387AbcJ0VTf (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 27 Oct 2016 17:19:35 -0400
Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:36613 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S964799AbcJ0VTd (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 27 Oct 2016 17:19:33 -0400
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 23:19:30 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
        Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>,
        Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
        linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_VMAP_STACK, on-stack struct, and wake_up_bit
Message-ID: <20161027211930.2d2wc7tjbe3kfaxk@pd.tnic>
References: <CAHc6FU4e5sueLi7pfeXnSbuuvnc5PaU3xo5Hnn=SvzmQ+ZOEeg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+55aFzVmppmua4U0pesp2moz7vVPbH1NP264EKeW3YqOzFc3A@mail.gmail.com>
 <1731570270.13088320.1477515684152.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
 <20161026231358.36jysz2wycdf4anf@pd.tnic>
 <624629879.13118306.1477528645189.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
 <20161027123623.j2jri5bandimboff@pd.tnic>
 <411894642.13576957.1477594290544.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
 <20161027191951.zgcrcmvmla7ayeon@pd.tnic>
 <1932557416.13613945.1477602193309.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1932557416.13613945.1477602193309.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161014 (1.7.1)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 333
Lines: 12

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 05:03:13PM -0400, Bob Peterson wrote:
> I rebooted the machine with and without your patch, about 15 times
> each, and no failures. Not sure why I got it the first time. Must have
> been a one-off.

Ok, thanks for giving it a try!

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.