Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1034329AbcJ0X30 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:29:26 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f67.google.com ([209.85.218.67]:35759 "EHLO mail-oi0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933978AbcJ0X3X (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Oct 2016 19:29:23 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87vawdl7nm.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> References: <87bmy856wo.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> <87vawdl7nm.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 16:29:22 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: m1a5R1tVdfCbcH_i5TvL35X5khs Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PULL] modules: begin maintainer transition To: Rusty Russell Cc: LKML , Jessica Yu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 472 Lines: 15 On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 4:00 PM, Rusty Russell wrote: > > Well, I don't know her, I just know her work. > > But I'll figure it out. I see a module implementation trivia game in my > future! It's fine, and I certainly don't require any key signing on maintainership change, it's just obviously a nice thing to have as a "handoff". I'm assuming that Jessica can get her key signed lots of ways through various redhat people.. Linus