Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262013AbTEEHfh (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2003 03:35:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262023AbTEEHfh (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2003 03:35:37 -0400 Received: from louise.pinerecords.com ([213.168.176.16]:44501 "EHLO louise.pinerecords.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262013AbTEEHfh (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2003 03:35:37 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 09:48:04 +0200 From: Tomas Szepe To: Art Haas Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Latest GCC-3.3 is much quieter about sign/unsigned comparisons Message-ID: <20030505074803.GA1775@louise.pinerecords.com> References: <20030504212256.GE24907@debian> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030504212256.GE24907@debian> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 614 Lines: 16 > [ahaas@airmail.net] > > ... has eliminated all the warnings that GCC-3.3 by default printed > with regards to signed/unsigned comparisons. A build of today's BK > with this compiler is much quieter than those previously done > with the 3.3 snapshots. Is this a good thing, though? I'm quite sure those warnings were useful. -- Tomas Szepe - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/