Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1761644AbcJ1RMk (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:12:40 -0400 Received: from mezzanine.sirena.org.uk ([106.187.55.193]:44776 "EHLO mezzanine.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1761563AbcJ1RMi (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Oct 2016 13:12:38 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 18:12:01 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Jens Axboe Cc: Ulf Hansson , Paolo Valente , Christoph Hellwig , Arnd Bergmann , Bart Van Assche , Jan Kara , Tejun Heo , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Linux-Kernal , Linus Walleij , Hannes Reinecke , Grant Likely , James Bottomley Message-ID: <20161028171201.4tzhuedvybwrmwzb@sirena.org.uk> References: <38156FA7-9A66-44DC-8D0C-28F149D1E49B@linaro.org> <09fc1e06-3fd6-b13d-0dd9-0edfb55b01d1@kernel.dk> <15ee2d0e-2d3a-81e2-9f83-f875e41bf388@kernel.dk> <1ac9b794-7e7f-0748-e4c8-a13034aecbc3@kernel.dk> <4948c47a-6e24-0a81-0564-5a61b6be35e9@kernel.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7r537rz6c3oikgku" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4948c47a-6e24-0a81-0564-5a61b6be35e9@kernel.dk> X-Cookie: Serenity through viciousness. User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161014 (1.7.1) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 64.88.227.140 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: broonie@sirena.org.uk Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/14] introduce the BFQ-v0 I/O scheduler as an extra scheduler X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Mon, 26 Dec 2011 16:24:06 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mezzanine.sirena.org.uk); Unknown failure Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1450 Lines: 38 --7r537rz6c3oikgku Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 08:17:01AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 10/28/2016 12:36 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > > You have been pushing Paolo in different directions throughout the > > years with his work in BFQ, wasting lots of his time/effort. > I have not. Various entities have advised Paolo approach it in various ways. > We've had blk-mq for 3 years now, my position should have been pretty clear > on that. Having come to this somewhat late I have to say that that hasn't been 100% clear as a set opinion from everyone - in the time I've been following things there's been engagement about the meat of the code which gave the impression the patches were being seriously considered. But like I said in a previous mail this is all in the past anyway, we need to focus on the present situation. --7r537rz6c3oikgku Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAABCAAGBQJYE4bhAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQRbUH/jY2o1Fh0UtDI+3EzfglRtuL 0a3ihAYJSD4FbOimtMbyLgLG/3iKMmjWq3IFfxmlGIFvbxd3w6JKV/TBQLEwH7S+ vcNPBdHqCZMg+ClnnZlPKhYcVfCaaLDHkiV/Z3zi8NL09PAlMxNkfCeata9tKiji w/PInBb2Dw3TG5V1Pe/C4ZTwrjS20tjqMUmZtFF6dFSGZWXBBH3MwjnjjcPeZ6Hq u0r4JcxJ8jhwVj8jvb0krIS86BOAz5WuKrcRAGkLb+3aFUq/lMQBeW3fyP/VHC1P HCCewPhWZNxbJ4k2S6fnhUk8mVfjfVnxc+ao7lVVFr6ydfXpLMfhy06k9rQzwrk= =IVh6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7r537rz6c3oikgku--