Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262167AbTEEMzK (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2003 08:55:10 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262169AbTEEMzK (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2003 08:55:10 -0400 Received: from deviant.impure.org.uk ([195.82.120.238]:54145 "EHLO deviant.impure.org.uk") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262167AbTEEMzK (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 May 2003 08:55:10 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 May 2003 14:06:41 +0100 From: Dave Jones To: Tomas Szepe Cc: Art Haas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Latest GCC-3.3 is much quieter about sign/unsigned comparisons Message-ID: <20030505130641.GA13082@suse.de> Mail-Followup-To: Dave Jones , Tomas Szepe , Art Haas , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20030504212256.GE24907@debian> <20030505074803.GA1775@louise.pinerecords.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030505074803.GA1775@louise.pinerecords.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 739 Lines: 18 On Mon, May 05, 2003 at 09:48:04AM +0200, Tomas Szepe wrote: > > ... has eliminated all the warnings that GCC-3.3 by default printed > > with regards to signed/unsigned comparisons. A build of today's BK > > with this compiler is much quieter than those previously done > > with the 3.3 snapshots. > > Is this a good thing, though? I'm quite sure those warnings were useful. In a lot of cases, they were just noise. They are still there with -W if you really want to see them. Dave - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/