Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S942828AbcJ2NwN (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2016 09:52:13 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:49538 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S942547AbcJ2NwA (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Oct 2016 09:52:00 -0400 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Lyude , Maarten Lankhorst , Paulo Zanoni , Jani Nikula Subject: [PATCH 4.8 028/125] drm/i915: SAGV is not SKL-only, so rename a few things Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2016 09:49:06 -0400 Message-Id: <20161029134948.380993237@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.10.1 In-Reply-To: <20161029134947.232372651@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20161029134947.232372651@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 6247 Lines: 179 4.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Paulo Zanoni commit 674f823b455cdb94d5773406c1caac170f87e1c4 upstream. The plan is to introduce intel_has_sagv() and then use it to discover which platforms actually support it. I thought about keeping the functions with their current skl names, but found two problems: (i) skl_has_sagv() would become a very confusing name, and (ii) intel_atomic_commit_tail() doesn't seem to be calling any functions whose name start with a platform name, so the "intel_" naming scheme seems make more sense than the "firstplatorm_" naming scheme here. Reviewed-by: Lyude Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst Signed-off-by: Paulo Zanoni Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1474578035-424-2-git-send-email-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com (cherry picked from commit 16dcdc4edbcf5cb130004737f2548401776170f1) Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 10 +++++----- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 8 ++++---- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h | 6 +++--- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 26 +++++++++++++------------- 4 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h @@ -1967,11 +1967,11 @@ struct drm_i915_private { struct vlv_s0ix_state vlv_s0ix_state; enum { - I915_SKL_SAGV_UNKNOWN = 0, - I915_SKL_SAGV_DISABLED, - I915_SKL_SAGV_ENABLED, - I915_SKL_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED - } skl_sagv_status; + I915_SAGV_UNKNOWN = 0, + I915_SAGV_DISABLED, + I915_SAGV_ENABLED, + I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED + } sagv_status; struct { /* --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c @@ -13891,8 +13891,8 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(str * SKL workaround: bspec recommends we disable the SAGV when we * have more then one pipe enabled */ - if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && !skl_can_enable_sagv(state)) - skl_disable_sagv(dev_priv); + if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && !intel_can_enable_sagv(state)) + intel_disable_sagv(dev_priv); intel_modeset_verify_disabled(dev); } @@ -13950,8 +13950,8 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(str } if (IS_SKYLAKE(dev_priv) && intel_state->modeset && - skl_can_enable_sagv(state)) - skl_enable_sagv(dev_priv); + intel_can_enable_sagv(state)) + intel_enable_sagv(dev_priv); drm_atomic_helper_commit_hw_done(state); --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h @@ -1717,9 +1717,9 @@ void ilk_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_devi void skl_wm_get_hw_state(struct drm_device *dev); void skl_ddb_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, struct skl_ddb_allocation *ddb /* out */); -bool skl_can_enable_sagv(struct drm_atomic_state *state); -int skl_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); -int skl_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); +bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct drm_atomic_state *state); +int intel_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); +int intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv); bool skl_ddb_allocation_equals(const struct skl_ddb_allocation *old, const struct skl_ddb_allocation *new, enum pipe pipe); --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c @@ -2890,12 +2890,12 @@ skl_wm_plane_id(const struct intel_plane * - We're not using an interlaced display configuration */ int -skl_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) +intel_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { int ret; - if (dev_priv->skl_sagv_status == I915_SKL_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED || - dev_priv->skl_sagv_status == I915_SKL_SAGV_ENABLED) + if (dev_priv->sagv_status == I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED || + dev_priv->sagv_status == I915_SAGV_ENABLED) return 0; DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Enabling the SAGV\n"); @@ -2913,19 +2913,19 @@ skl_enable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private */ if (ret == -ENXIO) { DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("No SAGV found on system, ignoring\n"); - dev_priv->skl_sagv_status = I915_SKL_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED; + dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED; return 0; } else if (ret < 0) { DRM_ERROR("Failed to enable the SAGV\n"); return ret; } - dev_priv->skl_sagv_status = I915_SKL_SAGV_ENABLED; + dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_ENABLED; return 0; } static int -skl_do_sagv_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) +intel_do_sagv_disable(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { int ret; uint32_t temp = GEN9_SAGV_DISABLE; @@ -2939,19 +2939,19 @@ skl_do_sagv_disable(struct drm_i915_priv } int -skl_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) +intel_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) { int ret, result; - if (dev_priv->skl_sagv_status == I915_SKL_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED || - dev_priv->skl_sagv_status == I915_SKL_SAGV_DISABLED) + if (dev_priv->sagv_status == I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED || + dev_priv->sagv_status == I915_SAGV_DISABLED) return 0; DRM_DEBUG_KMS("Disabling the SAGV\n"); mutex_lock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock); /* bspec says to keep retrying for at least 1 ms */ - ret = wait_for(result = skl_do_sagv_disable(dev_priv), 1); + ret = wait_for(result = intel_do_sagv_disable(dev_priv), 1); mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock); if (ret == -ETIMEDOUT) { @@ -2965,18 +2965,18 @@ skl_disable_sagv(struct drm_i915_private */ if (result == -ENXIO) { DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("No SAGV found on system, ignoring\n"); - dev_priv->skl_sagv_status = I915_SKL_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED; + dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_NOT_CONTROLLED; return 0; } else if (result < 0) { DRM_ERROR("Failed to disable the SAGV\n"); return result; } - dev_priv->skl_sagv_status = I915_SKL_SAGV_DISABLED; + dev_priv->sagv_status = I915_SAGV_DISABLED; return 0; } -bool skl_can_enable_sagv(struct drm_atomic_state *state) +bool intel_can_enable_sagv(struct drm_atomic_state *state) { struct drm_device *dev = state->dev; struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev);