MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4a73a7d8-599c-eb25-0f78-d921a16bb56f@leemhuis.info>
References: <CAPcyv4gDYcahNJ6CEzf2eUGq8sGqW8Yo09T8cscGWTLoja7PXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161020122931.GD19876@codeblueprint.co.uk> <CAPcyv4hT+yQvnQzfb49FP-+vVaVKHTYEj1EjNd9Xvu0Wr8T+Bg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPcyv4gE0wtoR3Yxh6axiQpPE2MvDgGW=JLEz9b7OMSBQZ_HDQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161021154129.GH27807@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20161021202022.GI27807@codeblueprint.co.uk>
 <CAPcyv4jkVcBwecxwt1P+p-fMSuen9B9xHEVf0BjM5uJZ4_jAdw@mail.gmail.com> <4a73a7d8-599c-eb25-0f78-d921a16bb56f@leemhuis.info>
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 30 Oct 2016 08:59:58 -0700
Message-ID: <CAPcyv4gNyUMU+r-N-qa6ZrF0zG2AuirR0NqVRu40jAgNqc5MNw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result
To: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
        Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 665
Lines: 13

On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis
<regressions@leemhuis.info> wrote:
> JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll
> watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress
> in my weekly reports. Please let me know via regressions@leemhuis.info
> in case the discussion moves to a different place (bugzilla or another
> mail thread for example). tia!
>
> Current status (afaics) in my report: This looks stuck. Or was is
> discussed (or even fixed) somewhere else?

Thanks, and no, not fixed yet. I've not found the time to run the
experiments Matt needs, but a colleague has offered to look into it.