Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S932396AbcJaJif (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 31 Oct 2016 05:38:35 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:38484 "EHLO
        mail-wm0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1764115AbcJaJic (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 31 Oct 2016 05:38:32 -0400
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 09:38:29 +0000
From: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@leemhuis.info>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
        Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 4.9-rc1 boot regression, ambiguous bisect result
Message-ID: <20161031093829.GA8845@codeblueprint.co.uk>
References: <CAPcyv4gDYcahNJ6CEzf2eUGq8sGqW8Yo09T8cscGWTLoja7PXw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161020122931.GD19876@codeblueprint.co.uk>
 <CAPcyv4hT+yQvnQzfb49FP-+vVaVKHTYEj1EjNd9Xvu0Wr8T+Bg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAPcyv4gE0wtoR3Yxh6axiQpPE2MvDgGW=JLEz9b7OMSBQZ_HDQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <20161021154129.GH27807@codeblueprint.co.uk>
 <20161021202022.GI27807@codeblueprint.co.uk>
 <CAPcyv4jkVcBwecxwt1P+p-fMSuen9B9xHEVf0BjM5uJZ4_jAdw@mail.gmail.com>
 <4a73a7d8-599c-eb25-0f78-d921a16bb56f@leemhuis.info>
 <CAPcyv4gNyUMU+r-N-qa6ZrF0zG2AuirR0NqVRu40jAgNqc5MNw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPcyv4gNyUMU+r-N-qa6ZrF0zG2AuirR0NqVRu40jAgNqc5MNw@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24+41 (02bc14ed1569) (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 873
Lines: 17

On Sun, 30 Oct, at 08:59:58AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 5:08 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis
> <regressions@leemhuis.info> wrote:
> > JFYI: I added this report to the list of regressions for Linux 4.9. I'll
> > watch this thread for further updates on this issue to document progress
> > in my weekly reports. Please let me know via regressions@leemhuis.info
> > in case the discussion moves to a different place (bugzilla or another
> > mail thread for example). tia!
> >
> > Current status (afaics) in my report: This looks stuck. Or was is
> > discussed (or even fixed) somewhere else?
> 
> Thanks, and no, not fixed yet. I've not found the time to run the
> experiments Matt needs, but a colleague has offered to look into it.

Of course, if you are willing to help with debugging, Thorsten, it
would be much appreciated and this bug might get fixed sooner.