Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S944239AbcJaSWB (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:22:01 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([146.0.238.70]:53676 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757270AbcJaSWA (ORCPT ); Mon, 31 Oct 2016 14:22:00 -0400 Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2016 12:19:16 -0600 (MDT) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Fengguang Wu cc: Ye Xiaolong , Russ Anderson , Dimitri Sivanich , Matt Fleming , x86@kernel.org, LKML , Mike Travis , Masahiro Yamada , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Alex Thorlton , lkp@01.org Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [x86/platform/UV] 71854cb812: will-it-scale.per_thread_ops -2.3% regression In-Reply-To: <20161031054101.b27mjyr46b3r2tbp@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> Message-ID: References: <20161025064647.GB3341@yexl-desktop> <20161027015508.GG21890@yexl-desktop> <20161031054101.b27mjyr46b3r2tbp@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1056 Lines: 27 On Mon, 31 Oct 2016, Fengguang Wu wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 12:37:45AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > I have no explanation for this either, but you really should try to figure > > out what's going on here. > > Xiaolong, how about doing a small debug patch (a WARN_ONCE() line may > be enough) to verify whether the code path is executed? > > It'd also help to compare vmlinux according to Thomas' reasoning: > > > The only difference between plain rc1 and rc + this patch is the resulting > > text size and therefor some other unrelated stuff moving to different > > places in memory which has some yet to figure out side effects. So one other thing you might try is using rc3 as a base line and then revert the patch in question on top of rc3 and see whether that weird behaviour persists. > > From bisect POV, the below graphs show the user_time and system_time > are clearly and consistently different before/after commit 71854cb812. > So this commit must impacted something. I agree. I just have no idea what happens. Thanks, tglx