Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S946343AbcKAHMu (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2016 03:12:50 -0400 Received: from 7.mo173.mail-out.ovh.net ([46.105.44.159]:45260 "EHLO 7.mo173.mail-out.ovh.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S945471AbcKAHMt (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2016 03:12:49 -0400 From: Lukasz Majewski To: Thierry Reding , Stefan Agner , Sascha Hauer , Boris Brezillon Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Fabio Estevam , Fabio Estevam , Lothar Wassmann , Bhuvanchandra DV , kernel@pengutronix.de, Lukasz Majewski , =?UTF-8?q?Lothar=20Wa=C3=9Fmann?= Subject: [PATCH v3 08/11] pwm: imx: Remove redundant i.MX PWMv2 code Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 08:10:27 +0100 Message-Id: <1477984230-18071-9-git-send-email-l.majewski@majess.pl> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.1.4 In-Reply-To: <1477984230-18071-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@majess.pl> References: <1477984230-18071-1-git-send-email-l.majewski@majess.pl> X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 4642929743498691205 X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeelvddrkedtgddutdeiucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfdpvefjgfevmfevgfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddm Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 4615 Lines: 181 The code providing functionality surpassed by the atomic PWM is not needed anymore and hence can be removed. Suggested-by: Stefan Agner Suggested-by: Boris Brezillon Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski Reviewed-by: Boris Brezillon --- Changes for v3: - None Changes for v2: - None --- drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 118 -------------------------------------------------- 1 file changed, 118 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c index cd53c05..b636526 100644 --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c @@ -53,10 +53,6 @@ struct imx_chip { void __iomem *mmio_base; struct pwm_chip chip; - - int (*config)(struct pwm_chip *chip, - struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns); - void (*set_enable)(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool enable); }; #define to_imx_chip(chip) container_of(chip, struct imx_chip, chip) @@ -228,109 +224,6 @@ static int imx_pwm_apply_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm, return 0; } -static int imx_pwm_config_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip, - struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns) -{ - struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip); - unsigned long long c; - unsigned long period_cycles, duty_cycles, prescale; - bool enable = pwm_is_enabled(pwm); - u32 cr; - - /* - * i.MX PWMv2 has a 4-word sample FIFO. - * In order to avoid FIFO overflow issue, we do software reset - * to clear all sample FIFO if the controller is disabled or - * wait for a full PWM cycle to get a relinquished FIFO slot - * when the controller is enabled and the FIFO is fully loaded. - */ - if (enable) - imx_pwm_wait_fifo_slot(chip, pwm); - else - imx_pwm_sw_reset(chip); - - c = clk_get_rate(imx->clk_per); - c = c * period_ns; - do_div(c, 1000000000); - period_cycles = c; - - prescale = period_cycles / 0x10000 + 1; - - period_cycles /= prescale; - c = (unsigned long long)period_cycles * duty_ns; - do_div(c, period_ns); - duty_cycles = c; - - /* - * according to imx pwm RM, the real period value should be - * PERIOD value in PWMPR plus 2. - */ - if (period_cycles > 2) - period_cycles -= 2; - else - period_cycles = 0; - - writel(duty_cycles, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMSAR); - writel(period_cycles, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMPR); - - cr = MX3_PWMCR_PRESCALER(prescale) | - MX3_PWMCR_DOZEEN | MX3_PWMCR_WAITEN | - MX3_PWMCR_DBGEN | MX3_PWMCR_CLKSRC_IPG_HIGH; - - if (enable) - cr |= MX3_PWMCR_EN; - - writel(cr, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR); - - return 0; -} - -static void imx_pwm_set_enable_v2(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool enable) -{ - struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip); - u32 val; - - val = readl(imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR); - - if (enable) - val |= MX3_PWMCR_EN; - else - val &= ~MX3_PWMCR_EN; - - writel(val, imx->mmio_base + MX3_PWMCR); -} - -static int imx_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, - struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns) -{ - struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip); - - return imx->config(chip, pwm, duty_ns, period_ns); -} - -static int imx_pwm_enable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) -{ - struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip); - int ret; - - ret = clk_prepare_enable(imx->clk_per); - if (ret) - return ret; - - imx->set_enable(chip, true); - - return 0; -} - -static void imx_pwm_disable(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm) -{ - struct imx_chip *imx = to_imx_chip(chip); - - imx->set_enable(chip, false); - - clk_disable_unprepare(imx->clk_per); -} - static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v1 = { .enable = imx_pwm_enable_v1, .disable = imx_pwm_disable_v1, @@ -339,17 +232,11 @@ static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v1 = { }; static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops_v2 = { - .enable = imx_pwm_enable, - .disable = imx_pwm_disable, - .config = imx_pwm_config, .apply = imx_pwm_apply_v2, .owner = THIS_MODULE, }; struct imx_pwm_data { - int (*config)(struct pwm_chip *chip, - struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns); - void (*set_enable)(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool enable); struct pwm_ops *pwm_ops; }; @@ -358,8 +245,6 @@ static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v1 = { }; static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v2 = { - .config = imx_pwm_config_v2, - .set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v2, .pwm_ops = &imx_pwm_ops_v2, }; @@ -406,9 +291,6 @@ static int imx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) if (IS_ERR(imx->mmio_base)) return PTR_ERR(imx->mmio_base); - imx->config = data->config; - imx->set_enable = data->set_enable; - ret = pwmchip_add(&imx->chip); if (ret < 0) return ret; -- 2.1.4