Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1168161AbcKAJHk (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2016 05:07:40 -0400 Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.26]:45111 "EHLO out2-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1168171AbcKAJHb (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2016 05:07:31 -0400 X-ME-Sender: X-Sasl-enc: WbXjdfT+cigvLBRV0i0tpLVtRzWJk9ulzsaNmGNXvleq 1477991248 Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 10:07:26 +0100 From: Patrick Steinhardt To: Junio C Hamano Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Git v2.11.0-rc0 Message-ID: <20161101090726.GA478@pks-pc> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3150 Lines: 76 --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Junio, On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 02:49:42PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote: [snip] > * In some projects, it is common to use "[RFC PATCH]" as the subject > prefix for a patch meant for discussion rather than application. A > new option "--rfc" was a short-hand for "--subject-prefix=3DRFC PATCH" ~~~ > to help the participants of such projects. This should probably be 'A new option "--rfc" was introduced as a short-hand for=E2=80=A6' or similar. > * When given an abbreviated object name that is not (or more > realistically, "no longer") unique, we gave a fatal error > "ambiguous argument". This error is now accompanied by hints that > lists the objects that begins with the given prefix. During the > course of development of this new feature, numerous minor bugs were > uncovered and corrected, the most notable one of which is that we > gave "short SHA1 xxxx is ambiguous." twice without good reason. I think "This error is now accompanied by a hint that lists the objects beginning with the given prefix." would be grammatically more correct. > * "git diff -W" output needs to extend the context backward to > include the header line of the current function and also forward to > include the body of the entire current function up to the header > line of the next one. This process may have to merge to adjacent ~~ > hunks, but the code forgot to do so in some cases. This should probably be "_two_ adjacent hunks". > * In a worktree connected to a repository elsewhere, created via "git > worktree", "git checkout" attempts to protect users from confusion > by refusing to check out a branch that is already checked out in > another worktree. However, this also prevented checking out a > branch, which is designated as the primary branch of a bare > reopsitory, in a worktree that is connected to the bare ~~~~~~~~~~ > repository. The check has been corrected to allow it. There's a typo here in "reopsitory". Regards Patrick Steinhardt --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAABCAAGBQJYGFtOAAoJEBF8Z7aeq/EsORUP/RrEwaZSy9zhsqS4gDvflfgN qhmrxdDbR7lIQ/oNzGMbM5WnrrBisKUmlaxXqNI3u3oBgjTU7MgeduPZmCWR26dC JSo2zc+yMCuRF5dASlHAKsxkEjw642Bl1j9jPFDH+1mzefSGyc/7vv0UfUzSxElP 2R9NiXHtvbiHyr2cojyl1WfPGEmebanrBmwk7MjkCoXPfaGGi1D2QKrV5FAqIgj4 1Y7rfdKRvBaYZUITTlRvAMQx9rB00Cwoo9kqRbAmKpBMPrZnbAwS6yK2TIJmeoUk vteVoeY7vTzp9UebXyh7KZzdt/sXy/KWcxSUa1HDLjWmNMSoO6Fa0YeY85DYfRH4 szURdY/lHwmDnAqyTpmpUH4jcuW+LrBHklPu3zG4k7FUnq+pxwZcfb6MP+yOrMyc XPH+okZL7aQoj2fqTEpIM1sH2CJFgxAwop/vSxJwYYH0xFmyvNMJBrLRZj4sX7Uv 3hmbRyRdoX/gCp3QGpTBPDi1HIWcRzZd+7stOcCaH1cp5RduDJGfVAUkEpDarW/D 9UUsGdw2Wz6AZXGkx419dLjUWSnZ24gFSc2by6WZ1YMy8MJ8NrVLG/j8vtKpCoeI Fi3Yc7y24UacA3f4W7MaDDKDGoPsuoNQBkCzy5+LgXQmgTEHaY4ixgr07Mj2VHUR ATl3Oj+6uMPrp5/B4T1t =YH2s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7--