Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1422790AbcKAJYN (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2016 05:24:13 -0400 Received: from mailgw01.mediatek.com ([210.61.82.183]:41088 "EHLO mailgw01.mediatek.com" rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1422751AbcKAJYK (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2016 05:24:10 -0400 Message-ID: <1477992234.8785.9.camel@mtksdaap41> Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 1/4] clk: mediatek: Add MT2701 clock support From: James Liao To: Stephen Boyd CC: Erin Lo , Matthias Brugger , Mike Turquette , "Rob Herring" , Arnd Bergmann , Sascha Hauer , Daniel Kurtz , Philipp Zabel , , , , , , , , , Shunli Wang Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 17:23:54 +0800 In-Reply-To: <20161031180647.GR16026@codeaurora.org> References: <1477020742-13889-1-git-send-email-erin.lo@mediatek.com> <1477020742-13889-2-git-send-email-erin.lo@mediatek.com> <20161028011753.GS26139@codeaurora.org> <1477896558.5376.13.camel@mtksdaap41> <20161031180647.GR16026@codeaurora.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MTK: N Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2138 Lines: 60 Hi Stephen, On Mon, 2016-10-31 at 11:06 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 10/31, James Liao wrote: > > On Thu, 2016-10-27 at 18:17 -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > On 10/21, Erin Lo wrote: > > > > @@ -244,3 +256,31 @@ void mtk_clk_register_composites(const struct mtk_composite *mcs, > > > > clk_data->clks[mc->id] = clk; > > > > } > > > > } > > > > + > > > > +void mtk_clk_register_dividers(const struct mtk_clk_divider *mcds, > > > > + int num, void __iomem *base, spinlock_t *lock, > > > > + struct clk_onecell_data *clk_data) > > > > +{ > > > > + struct clk *clk; > > > > + int i; > > > > + > > > > + for (i = 0; i < num; i++) { > > > > + const struct mtk_clk_divider *mcd = &mcds[i]; > > > > + > > > > + if (clk_data && !IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk_data->clks[mcd->id])) > > > > > > NULL is a valid clk. IS_ERR_OR_NULL is usually wrong. > > > > Why NULL is a valid clk? > > Perhaps at some point we'll want to return a NULL pointer to > clk_get() callers so that they can handle things like optional > clocks easily without having any storage requirements. I don't > know if we'll ever do that, but that's just a possibility. > > > > > clk_data is designed for multiple initialization from different clock > > types, such as infra_clk_data in clk-mt2701.c. So it will ignore valid > > clocks to avoid duplicated clock registration. Here I assume a clock > > pointer with error code or NULL to be an invalid (not initialized) > > clock. > > > > Ok. Would it be possible to initialize the array with all error > pointers? That would make things less error prone, but it Yes. Current mtk_alloc_clk_data() implementation init all elements with ERR_PTR(-ENOENT). > probably doesn't matter at all anyway because this is done during > registration time. IS_ERR_OR_NULL makes me take a second look > each time, because it's usually wrong. I see. Although currently all Mediatek clk drivers use mtk_alloc_clk_data() to allocate clk_data, I would like to keep the flexibility to support zero-initialized clk_data such as a static structure. So I prefer to treat a NULL pointer as an uninitialized clock. Best regards, James