Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S966073AbcKAOCL (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 1 Nov 2016 10:02:11 -0400
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:53462 "EHLO newverein.lst.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S966036AbcKAOCK (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 1 Nov 2016 10:02:10 -0400
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 15:02:08 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
        Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.com>, Ming@suse.de,
        "Lei <tom.leiming"@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] loop: Pass logical blocksize in 'lo_init[0]' ioctl
        field
Message-ID: <20161101140208.GC16815@lst.de>
References: <1477942639-109971-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <1477942639-109971-5-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1477942639-109971-5-git-send-email-hare@suse.de>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 364
Lines: 7

On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 08:37:19PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> The current LOOP_SET_STATUS64 ioctl has two unused fields
> 'init[2]', which can be used in conjunction with the
> LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE flag to pass in the new logical blocksize.

Can we give them sane field names while at it?  Also I see now reason
not to merge this with the previous two patches.