Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753250AbcKAQ6Z (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2016 12:58:25 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:59413 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751745AbcKAQ6Y (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2016 12:58:24 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] loop: Pass logical blocksize in 'lo_init[0]' ioctl field To: Christoph Hellwig References: <1477942639-109971-1-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <1477942639-109971-5-git-send-email-hare@suse.de> <20161101140208.GC16815@lst.de> Cc: Jens Axboe , Alexander Graf , Ming@suse.de, "\"Lei" <"tom.leiming\""@gmail.co>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Hannes Reinecke Message-ID: Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 17:58:19 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161101140208.GC16815@lst.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 766 Lines: 22 On 11/01/2016 03:02 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 08:37:19PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: >> The current LOOP_SET_STATUS64 ioctl has two unused fields >> 'init[2]', which can be used in conjunction with the >> LO_FLAGS_BLOCKSIZE flag to pass in the new logical blocksize. > > Can we give them sane field names while at it? Also I see now reason > not to merge this with the previous two patches. > Sure I can rename it. As for merging, I don't really care. So for the next round I'll be merging them all together. Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke zSeries & Storage hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 N?rnberg GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imend?rffer, HRB 16746 (AG N?rnberg)