Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754602AbcKAUL3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:11:29 -0400 Received: from nblzone-211-213.nblnetworks.fi ([83.145.211.213]:49144 "EHLO hillosipuli.retiisi.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753217AbcKAUL1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Nov 2016 16:11:27 -0400 Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 22:11:23 +0200 From: Sakari Ailus To: Ivaylo Dimitrov Cc: Pavel Machek , sre@kernel.org, pali.rohar@gmail.com, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, galak@codeaurora.org, mchehab@osg.samsung.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] media: Driver for Toshiba et8ek8 5MP sensor Message-ID: <20161101201122.GF3217@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> References: <20161023200355.GA5391@amd> <20161023201954.GI9460@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> <20161023203315.GC6391@amd> <20161031225408.GB3217@valkosipuli.retiisi.org.uk> <7bf0bd23-e7fc-8dae-8d57-2477b942acbc@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7bf0bd23-e7fc-8dae-8d57-2477b942acbc@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1535 Lines: 46 Hi Ivaylo, On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 08:36:57AM +0200, Ivaylo Dimitrov wrote: > Hi, > > On 1.11.2016 00:54, Sakari Ailus wrote: > >Hi Pavel, > > > >On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 10:33:15PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote: > >>Hi! > >> > >>>Thanks, this answered half of my questions already. ;-) > >> > >>:-). > >> > >>I'll have to go through the patches, et8ek8 driver is probably not > >>enough to get useful video. platform/video-bus-switch.c is needed for > >>camera switching, then some omap3isp patches to bind flash and > >>autofocus into the subdevice. > >> > >>Then, device tree support on n900 can be added. > > > >I briefly discussed with with Sebastian. > > > >Do you think the elusive support for the secondary camera is worth keeping > >out the main camera from the DT in mainline? As long as there's a reasonable > >way to get it working, I'd just merge that. If someone ever gets the > >secondary camera working properly and nicely with the video bus switch, > >that's cool, we'll somehow deal with the problem then. But frankly I don't > >think it's very useful even if we get there: the quality is really bad. > > > > Yes, lets merge what we have till now, it will be way easier to improve on > it once it is part of the mainline. > > BTW, I have (had) patched VBS working almost without problems, when it comes > to it I'll dig it. I wonder if I'm the only one who wonders what VBS is here. Don't tell me its the old MS thing. :-) ;-) -- Kind regards, Sakari Ailus e-mail: sakari.ailus@iki.fi XMPP: sailus@retiisi.org.uk