Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 05:37:52 +0000
From: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@arm.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com,
        vincent.guittot@linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
        peterz@infradead.org, broonie@kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
        dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, robh+dt@kernel.org, sudeep.holla@arm.com,
        linux@arm.linux.org.uk, morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 REPOST 0/9] CPUs capacity information for
 heterogeneous systems
Message-ID: <20161103053752.GB16920@e106622-lin>
References: <20161017154650.18779-1-juri.lelli@arm.com>
 <20161030142246.od5skjzegyp62hma@localhost>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20161030142246.od5skjzegyp62hma@localhost>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1299
Lines: 35

Hi Catalin,

On 30/10/16 14:22, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 04:46:41PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> > I'm thus now assuming that everybody is OK with the patches and that they can
> > be queued for 4.10 (we certainly need this plumbing at this point). Please
> > speak if my assumption is wrong (and provide feedback! :).
> > Otherwise I'm going to:
> > 
> >  - use Russell's patching system for patches 2 and 8
> >  - ask Sudeep to pull patches 3,5,6 and 7
> >  - ask Catalin/Will to pull patches 1,4 and 9
> 
> I'm happy to queue patches 1, 4 and 9 for 4.10 (though it might have
> been easier for the whole series to go through arm-soc).
> 
> > Do you think we might get into trouble splitting the merge process this way?
> 
> Probably not. The only minor downside is that I have to grab a new DT
> for Juno from Sudeep to test the patches. Not an issue, though.
> 

Thanks and apologies if merging through different trees generates some
confusion.

I updated arm patches to address Russell's comments. I did the same for
arm64. I'll reply with the updated version, so you can see if it looks
good to you as well. In case it is OK, I already updated the for-arm64
branch with the new version:
 
 git://linux-arm.org/linux-jl.git upstream/default_caps_for-arm64 

Best,

- Juri