Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756910AbcKCLUT (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2016 07:20:19 -0400 Received: from mail-pf0-f193.google.com ([209.85.192.193]:35688 "EHLO mail-pf0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753724AbcKCLUR (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2016 07:20:17 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 03:20:12 -0800 From: Kent Overstreet To: Ming Lei Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-block , Linux FS Devel , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Jens Axboe , Hannes Reinecke , Mike Christie , Dan Williams , Toshi Kani Subject: Re: [PATCH 28/60] block: introduce QUEUE_FLAG_SPLIT_MP Message-ID: <20161103112012.ehqnfeswdf3eo4kd@kmo-pixel> References: <1477728600-12938-1-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com> <1477728600-12938-29-git-send-email-tom.leiming@gmail.com> <20161031153915.GL30919@infradead.org> <20161102030813.spwwymvdrym3lrah@kmo-pixel> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161014 (1.7.1) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1969 Lines: 39 On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 06:38:57PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:08 AM, Kent Overstreet > wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 08:39:15AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >> On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 04:08:27PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: > >> > Some drivers(such as dm) should be capable of dealing with multipage > >> > bvec, but the incoming bio may be too big, such as, a new singlepage bvec > >> > bio can't be cloned from the bio, or can't be allocated to singlepage > >> > bvec with same size. > >> > > >> > At least crypt dm, log writes and bcache have this kind of issue. > >> > >> We already have the segment_size limitation for request based drivers. > >> I'd rather extent it to bio drivers if really needed. > >> > >> But then again we should look into not having this limitation. E.g. > >> for bcache I'd be really surprised if it's that limited, given that > >> Kent came up with this whole multipage bvec scheme. > > > > AFAIK the only issue is with drivers that may have to bounce bios - pages that > > were contiguous in the original bio won't necessarily be contiguous in the > > bounced bio, thus bouncing might require more than BIO_MAX_SEGMENTS bvecs. > > > > I don't know what Ming's referring to by "singlepage bvec bios". > > > > Anyways, bouncing comes up in multiple places so we probably need to come up > > with a generic solution for that. Other than that, there shouldn't be any issues > > or limitations - if you're not bouncing, there's no need to clone the bvecs. > > AFAIK, the only special case is bch_data_verify(): drivers/md/bcache/debug.c, > for other bio_clone(), no direct access to io vec table, so default > multipage bvec > copy is fine. > > I will remove the flag and try to fix bch_data_verify() by using multiple bio, > and I remembered I cooked patch to do that long time ago, :-) You can #ifdef out the bch_data_verify() code, it's debug code that hasn't been used in ages.