Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262489AbTEFJjj (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2003 05:39:39 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262494AbTEFJjj (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2003 05:39:39 -0400 Received: from ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com ([166.70.28.69]:34628 "EHLO frodo.biederman.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262489AbTEFJji (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 May 2003 05:39:38 -0400 To: "Stephen M. Kenton" Cc: linux kernel mailing list Subject: Re: Kernel hot-swap using Kexec, BProc and CC/SMP Clusters. References: <3EB729D3.A5BFF512@ou.edu> From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) Date: 06 May 2003 03:49:08 -0600 In-Reply-To: <3EB729D3.A5BFF512@ou.edu> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 526 Lines: 9 "Stephen M. Kenton" writes: > Assuming this would work, any reason it should not be doable > on a HT uniprocessor rather than a "real" smp box? No but currently we are a significant ways from both process migration, and running multiple kernels on one box. Eric - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/