Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933290AbcKCWNO (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2016 18:13:14 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f44.google.com ([209.85.218.44]:32986 "EHLO mail-oi0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759282AbcKCWNM (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2016 18:13:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 23:13:08 +0100 From: Daniel Lezcano To: Vineet Gupta Cc: Noam Camus , tglx@linutronix.de, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] ARC: timer: Build gfrc, rtc under same option (64-bit timers) Message-ID: <20161103221308.GO1859@mai> References: <1478208701-30923-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <1478208701-30923-7-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1478208701-30923-7-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 448 Lines: 15 On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:31:37PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > The original distinction was done as they were deveoped at different s/deveoped/developed/ > times and primarily becuse they are specific to UP (RTC) and SMP (GFRC). s/becuse/because/ > > But given that driver now handles that at runtime, (i.e. not allowing > RTC as clocksource in SMP), we can simplify things a bit. > > Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta > ---