Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933359AbcKCWrA (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2016 18:47:00 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f47.google.com ([74.125.82.47]:36150 "EHLO mail-wm0-f47.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753958AbcKCWq7 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Nov 2016 18:46:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 23:46:50 +0100 From: Daniel Lezcano To: Vineet Gupta Cc: Noam Camus , tglx@linutronix.de, linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/10] ARC: timer: rtc: implement read loop in "C" vs. inline asm Message-ID: <20161103224650.GE15759@mai> References: <1478208701-30923-1-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <1478208701-30923-2-git-send-email-vgupta@synopsys.com> <20161103215221.GM1859@mai> <952c1d98-2827-5127-2440-edab342e6b77@synopsys.com> <20161103223523.GB15759@mai> <4ca3d740-dd75-fb4b-1967-aa3a605af62d@synopsys.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ca3d740-dd75-fb4b-1967-aa3a605af62d@synopsys.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 936 Lines: 27 On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:44:24PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > On 11/03/2016 03:35 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:23:09PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > >> On 11/03/2016 02:52 PM, Daniel Lezcano wrote: > >>> On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 02:31:32PM -0700, Vineet Gupta wrote: > >>>> The current code doesn't even compile .... > >>> > >>> Give a better description in the log, especially if this patch is supposed to > >>> go to stable@ > >> > >> OK. > > > > [ ... ] > > Here's what I added > > ----> > ARC: timer: rtc: implement read loop in "C" vs. inline asm > > The current code doesn't even compile as somehow the inline assembly > can't see the register names defined as ARC_RTC_* > I'm pretty sure It worked when I first got it merged, but the tools were > definitely different then. > > So better to write this in "C" anyways. Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano