Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S935318AbcKDPEz (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2016 11:04:55 -0400 Received: from mail-wm0-f68.google.com ([74.125.82.68]:35333 "EHLO mail-wm0-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932272AbcKDPEx (ORCPT ); Fri, 4 Nov 2016 11:04:53 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 17:04:47 +0200 From: Krzysztof Kozlowski To: Heiko Stuebner Cc: Jaehoon Chung , Krzysztof Kozlowski , linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/13] ARM: dts: exynos: replace to "max-frequecy" instead of "clock-freq-min-max" Message-ID: <20161104150447.GA4829@kozik-lap> References: <20161103062135.10697-1-jh80.chung@samsung.com> <20161103184112.GB11071@kozik-lap> <4066252.a1W9ejEKHX@phil> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4066252.a1W9ejEKHX@phil> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1484 Lines: 37 On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 12:19:49PM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Hi Jaehoon, > > Am Freitag, 4. November 2016, 19:21:30 CET schrieb Jaehoon Chung: > > On 11/04/2016 03:41 AM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 03:21:32PM +0900, Jaehoon Chung wrote: > > >> In drivers/mmc/core/host.c, there is "max-frequency" property. > > >> It should be same behavior. So Use the "max-frequency" instead of > > >> "clock-freq-min-max". > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Jaehoon Chung > > >> --- > > >> > > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5-eval.dts | 2 +- > > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-artik5.dtsi | 2 +- > > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-monk.dts | 2 +- > > >> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos3250-rinato.dts | 2 +- > > >> 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > > > This looks totally independent to rest of patches so it can be applied > > > separately without any functional impact (except lack of minimum > > > frequency). Is that correct? > > > > You're right. I will split the patches. And will resend. > > Thanks! > > I think what Krzysztof was asking was just if he can simply pick up this patch > alone, as it does not require any of the previous changes. > > Same is true for the Rockchip patches I guess, so we could just take them > individually into samsung/rockchip dts branches. Yes, I wanted to get exactly this information. I couldn't find it in cover letter. Best regards, Krzysztof