Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752630AbcKGLaN (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 7 Nov 2016 06:30:13 -0500
Received: from mail.sig21.net ([80.244.240.74]:41195 "EHLO mail.sig21.net"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752768AbcKGLaK (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 7 Nov 2016 06:30:10 -0500
Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 12:29:47 +0100
From: Johannes Stezenbach <js@linuxtv.org>
To: VDR User <user.vdr@gmail.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@s-opensource.com>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>,
        Patrick Boettcher <patrick.boettcher@posteo.de>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Michael Krufky <mkrufky@linuxtv.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
        =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rg?= Otte <jrg.otte@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 18/31] gp8psk: don't do DMA on stack
Message-ID: <20161107112947.qlxpzhxi5k3w7ajz@linuxtv.org>
References: <cover.1476179975.git.mchehab@s-opensource.com>
 <632081ba085ddf0ded63cce3dbcf3870485d3cd3.1476179975.git.mchehab@s-opensource.com>
 <CAA7C2qiW+Co3XVt1AQDYka9MdSYG8OELxNzecqAia9df0P3Neg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAA7C2qiW+Co3XVt1AQDYka9MdSYG8OELxNzecqAia9df0P3Neg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161014 (1.7.1)
X-Spam-21-Score: -2.9 (--)
X-Spam-21-Report: No, score=-2.9 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED=-1,BAYES_00=-1.9,KHOP_BIG_TO_CC=0.001,T_HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1458
Lines: 39

On Sun, Nov 06, 2016 at 11:51:14AM -0800, VDR User wrote:
> I applied this patch to the 4.8.4 kernel driver (that I'm currently
> running) and it caused nothing but "frontend 0/0 timed out while
> tuning". Is there another patch that should be used in conjunction
> with this? If not, this patch breaks the gp8psk driver.
> 
> Thanks.

Thanks for testing.  "If it's not tested it's broken"...

> On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 3:09 AM, Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> <mchehab@s-opensource.com> wrote:

> > index 5d0384dd45b5..fa215ad37f7b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/gp8psk.c
> > +++ b/drivers/media/usb/dvb-usb/gp8psk.c

> >  int gp8psk_usb_in_op(struct dvb_usb_device *d, u8 req, u16 value, u16 index, u8 *b, int blen)
> >  {
> > +       struct gp8psk_state *st = d->priv;
> >         int ret = 0,try = 0;
> >
> >         if ((ret = mutex_lock_interruptible(&d->usb_mutex)))
> >                 return ret;
> >
> >         while (ret >= 0 && ret != blen && try < 3) {
> > +               memcpy(st->data, b, blen);
> >                 ret = usb_control_msg(d->udev,
> >                         usb_rcvctrlpipe(d->udev,0),
> >                         req,
> >                         USB_TYPE_VENDOR | USB_DIR_IN,
> > -                       value,index,b,blen,
> > +                       value, index, st->data, blen,
> >                         2000);

I guess for usb_in the memcpy should be after the usb_control_msg
and from st->data to b.

Johannes