Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752820AbcKGLku (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2016 06:40:50 -0500 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:33112 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751543AbcKGLkr (ORCPT ); Mon, 7 Nov 2016 06:40:47 -0500 Date: Mon, 7 Nov 2016 11:39:47 +0000 From: Catalin Marinas To: Pratyush Anand Cc: steve.capper@linaro.org, srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vijaya.kumar@caviumnetworks.com, will.deacon@arm.com, oleg@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wcohen@redhat.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, dave.long@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 0/6] ARM64: Uprobe support added Message-ID: <20161107113944.GB28876@MBP.local> References: <20161104174951.vj4il3xkdy7a2ln7@localhost> <20161104184652.rxllldll4qfe7qdn@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2818 Lines: 58 On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 11:01:31AM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote: > On Saturday 05 November 2016 12:16 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2016 at 11:49:51AM -0600, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 02:40:40PM +0530, Pratyush Anand wrote: > > > > Pratyush Anand (6): > > > > arm64: kprobe: protect/rename few definitions to be reused by uprobe > > > > arm64: kgdb_step_brk_fn: ignore other's exception > > > > arm64: Handle TRAP_TRACE for user mode as well > > > > arm64: Handle TRAP_BRKPT for user mode as well > > > > arm64: introduce mm context flag to keep 32 bit task information > > > > arm64: Add uprobe support > > > > > > I queued the patches for 4.10. I will push them into -next sometime next > > > week once I do some testing (I'm currently at the LPC). > > > > I spoke too soon. With these patches on top of 4.9-rc3, defconfig > > together with FTRACE and UPROBE_EVENT enabled I get: > > > > In file included from /work/Linux/linux-2.6-aarch64/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c:20:0: > > /work/Linux/linux-2.6-aarch64/arch/arm64/include/asm/kprobes.h:52:5: error: conflicting types for 'kprobe_fault_handler' > > int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int fsr); > > ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > In file included from /work/Linux/linux-2.6-aarch64/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c:17:0: > > /work/Linux/linux-2.6-aarch64/include/linux/kprobes.h:398:90: note: previous definition of 'kprobe_fault_handler' was here > > static inline int kprobe_fault_handler(struct pt_regs *regs, int trapnr) > > ^ > > /work/Linux/linux-2.6-aarch64/scripts/Makefile.build:290: recipe for target 'arch/arm64/kernel/probes/decode-insn.o' failed > > Hummmm...CONFIG_KPROBE was defined in my setup and did not notice it :( . We > need to remove #include from > /arch/arm64/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c. > is already included from under #ifdef > CONFIG_KPROBE. > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c > b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c > index 8a29d29..6bf6657 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/probes/decode-insn.c > @@ -17,7 +17,6 @@ > #include > #include > #include > -#include > #include > #include > > So, do you want me to send V4 or a separate topup fixup patch. Please let me > know, will do accordingly. Just a separate patch on top of your series would do. Also please test your series with CONFIG_KPROBE disabled and I assume this wasn't done (just in case there is an interaction we were not aware of). Thanks. -- Catalin