Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753293AbcKHIgs (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2016 03:36:48 -0500 Received: from mx07-00178001.pphosted.com ([62.209.51.94]:23138 "EHLO mx07-00178001.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752079AbcKHIgp (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2016 03:36:45 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] clk: stm32f4: Add PLL_I2S & PLL_SAI for STM32F429/469 boards To: =?UTF-8?Q?Rados=c5=82aw_Pietrzyk?= References: <1478523943-23142-1-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> <1478523943-23142-2-git-send-email-gabriel.fernandez@st.com> CC: Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King , Maxime Coquelin , Alexandre Torgue , Michael Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Nicolas Pitre , Arnd Bergmann , Daniel Thompson , Andrea Merello , , , , , , , , From: Gabriel Fernandez Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:35:58 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.48.1.80] X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-11-08_03:,, signatures=0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 2490 Lines: 68 Hi Radosław Many thanks for reviewing. On 11/07/2016 03:57 PM, Radosław Pietrzyk wrote: >> +static struct clk_hw *clk_register_pll_div(const char *name, >> + const char *parent_name, unsigned long flags, >> + void __iomem *reg, u8 shift, u8 width, >> + u8 clk_divider_flags, const struct clk_div_table *table, >> + struct clk_hw *pll_hw, spinlock_t *lock) >> +{ >> + struct stm32f4_pll_div *pll_div; >> + struct clk_hw *hw; >> + struct clk_init_data init; >> + int ret; >> + >> + /* allocate the divider */ >> + pll_div = kzalloc(sizeof(*pll_div), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!pll_div) >> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >> + >> + init.name = name; >> + init.ops = &stm32f4_pll_div_ops; >> + init.flags = flags; > Maybe it's worth to have CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT here and the VCO clock > should have CLK_SET_RATE_GATE flag and we can get rid of custom > divider ops. I don't want to offer the possibility to change the vco clock through the divisor of the pll (only by a boot-loader or by DT). e.g. if i make a set rate on lcd-tft clock, i don't want to change the SAI frequencies. I used same structure for internal divisors of the pll (p, q, r) and for post divisors (plli2s-q-div, pllsai-q-div & pllsai-r-div). That why the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag is transmit by parameter. These divisors are similar because we have to switch off the pll before changing the rate. > > >> -static void stm32f4_rcc_register_pll(const char *hse_clk, const char *hsi_clk) >> + >> +static struct clk_hw *stm32f4_rcc_register_pll(const char *pllsrc, >> + const struct stm32f4_pll_data *data, spinlock_t *lock) >> { >> - unsigned long pllcfgr = readl(base + STM32F4_RCC_PLLCFGR); >> + struct stm32f4_pll *pll; >> + struct clk_init_data init = { NULL }; >> + void __iomem *reg; >> + struct clk_hw *pll_hw; >> + int ret; >> + >> + pll = kzalloc(sizeof(*pll), GFP_KERNEL); >> + if (!pll) >> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM); >> + >> + init.name = data->vco_name; >> + init.ops = &stm32f4_pll_gate_ops; >> + init.flags = CLK_IGNORE_UNUSED; > CLK_SET_RATE_GATE here > > Moreover why not having VCO as a composite clock from gate and mult ? Yes, that sounds a good idea. > According to docs SAI VCO (don't know about I2S ) must be within > certain range so clk_set_rate_range should be somewhere.