Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752877AbcKHOTn (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:19:43 -0500 Received: from smtprelay4.synopsys.com ([198.182.47.9]:39857 "EHLO smtprelay.synopsys.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750980AbcKHOTk (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2016 09:19:40 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] Device bindings documentation updated ACPI-enabled platforms not currently supported To: Andy Shevchenko , Luis Oliveira , Wolfram Sang , "Ramiro Oliveira" References: <36f4b1736e36b039af15b13645df0de492f1b6e1.1476462204.git.lolivei@synopsys.com> <20161014173014.GA26269@leverpostej> <20161014182045.GA1509@katana> <55cc91af-8d24-8aea-f74f-2ef40cd8ea5a@synopsys.com> <20161018151706.GA1433@katana> <76ab13e9-9aa5-97c3-2328-928bbcef9877@synopsys.com> <1477047272.6423.6.camel@linux.intel.com> CC: Mark Rutland , , , , , , , From: Luis Oliveira Message-ID: <9a3dd667-b8ac-7116-a855-538f3e91572f@synopsys.com> Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 14:18:44 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1477047272.6423.6.camel@linux.intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.107.25.121] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 1418 Lines: 50 Hi, As you suggested I will split the drivers. I am thinking of doing 5 patches: - factor out master() parts - separate Master part to i2c-designware-master.c (changes in i2c-designware-core.c) - enable Slave part to i2c-designware-slave (changes in i2c-designware-core.c) - glue drivers and device bindings - cleaning Regards, Luis On 21-Oct-16 11:54, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Fri, 2016-10-21 at 10:56 +0100, Luis Oliveira wrote: >> Since practically 90% of the code is shared between master and slave, >> I was >> thinking if it will be acceptable to use the same driver for both but >> differentiate the master/slave mode by the compatible strings. > It might be possible to split like other drivers do: > > 1. Core part (i2c-designware-core.c) > 2. Master part (i2c-designware-master.c) > 3. Slave part (i2c-designware-slave.c) > 4. Glue drivers (like: i2c-designware-platdrv.c) > >> Thanks, >> Luis >> >> On 10/18/2016 16:17, Wolfram Sang wrote: >>>> This is needed because the configuration is different and the i2c- >>>> designware >>>> cannot be master/slave without a reset. To resolve that I added >>>> this property >>>> to bind it as a slave when needed. >>> Aww, pity that the HW can't do that. Do you have details why? >>> >>> If that is really a HW limitation, then I'd suggest having a >>> seperate >>> driver for slave-only mode so we can differentiate by compatible >>> strings. >>> >>