To: "Randy.Dunlap" <rddunlap@osdl.org>
cc: "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com>,
       devenyga@mcmaster.ca, rml@tech9.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
       torvalds@transmeta.com
Reply-To: Gerrit Huizenga <gh@us.ibm.com>
From: Gerrit Huizenga <gh@us.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: PATCH: Replace current->state with set_current_state in 2.5.6 8 
In-reply-to: Your message of Tue, 06 May 2003 18:24:56 PDT.
             <20030506182456.644b70d1.rddunlap@osdl.org> 
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <7853.1052272887.1@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2003 19:01:27 -0700
Message-Id: <E19DEFM-00022j-00@w-gerrit2>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
Content-Length: 1216
Lines: 29

On Tue, 06 May 2003 18:24:56 PDT, "Randy.Dunlap" wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 6 May 2003 17:33:26 -0700  "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" <inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com> wrote:
> 
> | However, I'd suggest to post this into the Kernel Janitors mailing list and
> | let one of the big guys there swipe it in.
> | 
> 
> Yes, the KJ list has already seen this patch and commented on some version
> of it.
 
> Then it needs some exposure, like living in -ac or -mm or -pick1,
> or at least some testing (everyday usage) by a few people, with reports
> from them.
> 
> And I don't really want to review a 176 KB patch (although I did already
> look over most of it a few days ago).  Do people want to take portions
> of it for review and then see about Alan merging it, e.g.?

Hmm.  Has anyone considered a "Kernel Janitor's" tree?  More specifically,
a patch set, much like -ac or -mm, with the current cleanups so they
can be tested, pulled, run through automated batch testing, etc.?

gerrit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/