Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S934190AbcKILXw (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 06:23:52 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:55216 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933235AbcKILJh (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Nov 2016 06:09:37 -0500 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Heinz Mauelshagen , Mike Snitzer Subject: [PATCH 4.8 087/138] dm raid: fix activation of existing raid4/10 devices Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 11:46:10 +0100 Message-Id: <20161109102848.872213952@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.10.2 In-Reply-To: <20161109102844.808685475@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20161109102844.808685475@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Length: 3602 Lines: 85 4.8-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Heinz Mauelshagen commit b052b07c39d593c9954a84d5bbe1563999483f38 upstream. dm-raid 1.9.0 fails to activate existing RAID4/10 devices that have the old superblock format (which does not have takeover/reshaping support that was added via commit 33e53f06850f). Fix validation path for old superblocks by reverting to the old raid4 layout and basing checks on mddev->new_{level,layout,...} members in super_init_validation(). Signed-off-by: Heinz Mauelshagen Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- Documentation/device-mapper/dm-raid.txt | 1 + drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 12 +++++++----- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) --- a/Documentation/device-mapper/dm-raid.txt +++ b/Documentation/device-mapper/dm-raid.txt @@ -309,3 +309,4 @@ Version History with a reshape in progress. 1.9.0 Add support for RAID level takeover/reshape/region size and set size reduction. +1.9.1 Fix activation of existing RAID 4/10 mapped devices --- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c @@ -266,7 +266,7 @@ static struct raid_type { {"raid10_offset", "raid10 offset (striped mirrors)", 0, 2, 10, ALGORITHM_RAID10_OFFSET}, {"raid10_near", "raid10 near (striped mirrors)", 0, 2, 10, ALGORITHM_RAID10_NEAR}, {"raid10", "raid10 (striped mirrors)", 0, 2, 10, ALGORITHM_RAID10_DEFAULT}, - {"raid4", "raid4 (dedicated last parity disk)", 1, 2, 4, ALGORITHM_PARITY_N}, /* raid4 layout = raid5_n */ + {"raid4", "raid4 (dedicated first parity disk)", 1, 2, 5, ALGORITHM_PARITY_0}, /* raid4 layout = raid5_0 */ {"raid5_n", "raid5 (dedicated last parity disk)", 1, 2, 5, ALGORITHM_PARITY_N}, {"raid5_ls", "raid5 (left symmetric)", 1, 2, 5, ALGORITHM_LEFT_SYMMETRIC}, {"raid5_rs", "raid5 (right symmetric)", 1, 2, 5, ALGORITHM_RIGHT_SYMMETRIC}, @@ -2087,11 +2087,11 @@ static int super_init_validation(struct /* * No takeover/reshaping, because we don't have the extended v1.9.0 metadata */ - if (le32_to_cpu(sb->level) != mddev->level) { + if (le32_to_cpu(sb->level) != mddev->new_level) { DMERR("Reshaping/takeover raid sets not yet supported. (raid level/stripes/size change)"); return -EINVAL; } - if (le32_to_cpu(sb->layout) != mddev->layout) { + if (le32_to_cpu(sb->layout) != mddev->new_layout) { DMERR("Reshaping raid sets not yet supported. (raid layout change)"); DMERR(" 0x%X vs 0x%X", le32_to_cpu(sb->layout), mddev->layout); DMERR(" Old layout: %s w/ %d copies", @@ -2102,7 +2102,7 @@ static int super_init_validation(struct raid10_md_layout_to_copies(mddev->layout)); return -EINVAL; } - if (le32_to_cpu(sb->stripe_sectors) != mddev->chunk_sectors) { + if (le32_to_cpu(sb->stripe_sectors) != mddev->new_chunk_sectors) { DMERR("Reshaping raid sets not yet supported. (stripe sectors change)"); return -EINVAL; } @@ -2115,6 +2115,8 @@ static int super_init_validation(struct return -EINVAL; } + DMINFO("Discovered old metadata format; upgrading to extended metadata format"); + /* Table line is checked vs. authoritative superblock */ rs_set_new(rs); } @@ -3647,7 +3649,7 @@ static void raid_resume(struct dm_target static struct target_type raid_target = { .name = "raid", - .version = {1, 9, 0}, + .version = {1, 9, 1}, .module = THIS_MODULE, .ctr = raid_ctr, .dtr = raid_dtr,